Nintendo suffers a surprising setback in a trademark dispute with a Costa Rican supermarket. The supermarket, "Súper Mario," successfully defended its use of the name against the gaming giant. The court ruled in favor of the supermarket, accepting their argument that the name was a legitimate combination of their business type and the manager's first name.
The legal battle began in 2024 when Nintendo challenged the supermarket's trademark renewal. Nintendo argued infringement on their globally recognized Super Mario brand.
Image: x.com
However, the supermarket's legal team presented compelling evidence that the name wasn't intended to capitalize on Nintendo's intellectual property. They successfully demonstrated a straightforward connection between the name, the supermarket's nature, and the manager's name, Mario.
The supermarket's owner, Charito, expressed immense gratitude to his legal advisor, Jose Edgardo Jimenez Blanco, for their successful defense against the formidable opponent. He admitted they nearly conceded defeat before securing a positive outcome.
While Nintendo holds exclusive rights to the Super Mario trademark in many countries across various product categories, this case underscores the complexities of trademark law, particularly when established brands encounter smaller businesses with justifiable claims to similar names. The ruling serves as a cautionary tale, demonstrating that even powerful corporations can face significant legal hurdles in protecting their intellectual property. The case highlights the importance of thorough trademark research and the potential for unexpected legal challenges, even for globally recognized brands.
